Search
Press "Enter" to search and "ESC" to close.

Former U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi Skips Congress Amid Epstein Scandal

Pam Bondi avoids appearing before Congress over the Jeffrey Epstein case, intensifying political tensions and fueling debate.
2026-04-10T19:18:08-04:00
Share on FacebookShare on InstagramShare on TwitterShare on TikTokShare on YouTubeShare on WhatsApp
Suscríbete a Nuestro Boletín
Recibe por email las noticias más destacadas
Bondi, Congreso, Epstein MundoNOW, Pam Bondi Epstein testimony
Pam Bondi Epstein Testimony: She Fails to Appear Before Congress - PHOTO: EFE
  • Pam Bondi skips congressional appearance
  • Epstein case remains controversial
  • Investigation raises political tensions

The decision by former U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi not to appear before Congress has reignited controversy over the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case and increased tensions between the Legislative Branch and the Department of Justice amid a bipartisan investigation tied to Pam Bondi and her Epstein testimony.

Bondi defies congressional subpoena

According to EFE, former U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi decided not to appear before the House Oversight Committee, where she had been scheduled to testify on April 14.

Her absence comes amid legislative inquiries into the case of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Bondi had been removed from her position by President Donald Trump last week.

Despite this, the subpoena required her to appear before the House even after leaving office.

However, the Department of Justice stated that Bondi would not testify because she no longer holds the position of attorney general.

A spokesperson for the Oversight Committee confirmed the decision and said the body will evaluate its next steps.

The committee will now seek to contact Pam Bondi’s personal attorney to determine how to proceed regarding her Epstein testimony.

Criticism over handling of the Epstein case

Bondi, Congreso, Epstein MundoNOW, Pam Bondi Epstein Testimony: She Fails to Appear Before Congress
Pam Bondi Epstein Testimony: She Fails to Appear Before Congress – PHOTO: SHUTTERSTOCK

Bondi’s absence comes amid criticism of her role in the investigation of the Epstein case.

Her management of the case has been cited as one of the factors contributing to her removal from the Trump administration.

The Epstein case has generated political and media pressure due to the severity of the crimes and the network of connections surrounding the accused.

The Oversight Committee’s investigations began last year.

They included a subpoena requiring the Department of Justice to release case files with sensitive information redacted.

YOU MAY ALSO BE INTERESTED IN: Breaking: Trump fires Attorney General Pam Bondi amid political tensions

The process has involved high-profile figures who have been required to testify before Congress.

Among them are former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Evasive responses and controversy in prior hearings

Pam Bondi’s stance had already sparked controversy during a previous Judiciary Committee hearing in February.

During that appearance, she took a combative approach toward lawmakers.

She refused to apologize to Epstein’s victims who were present in the room.

She also strongly defended President Donald Trump during questioning.

One of the most talked-about moments came when she deflected a question about Epstein.

Bondi responded by mentioning that the Dow Jones Industrial Average “is above 50,000 points right now.”

The comment was interpreted as an attempt to avoid directly answering about the case.

Meanwhile, the Oversight Committee continues to expand its investigation.

It has been confirmed that Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, will testify on June 10.

Gates is expected to explain details of his relationship with Epstein.

Epstein died in 2019 after being found hanged in his cell at a federal prison.

Bondi’s decision not to appear leaves her role in the legislative process uncertain, keeping her Epstein testimony in focus.

The case continues to draw attention due to its political and judicial implications.

Etiquetas:
National
Regresar al Inicio