Supreme Court Upholds Restrictions on Transgender Athletes in Women’s School Sports

Supreme Court upholds restrictions in transgender athlete ruling.

States’ sports laws receive backing.

Ruling impacts 25 states.

The United States Supreme Court gave new support to state laws restricting transgender athletes from competing on women’s school and college sports teams.

The decision, approved by a conservative majority of six justices to three, upholds regulations promoted by states such as West Virginia and Idaho and creates a precedent that could strengthen similar laws across much of the country.

Supreme Court upholds restrictions for transgender athletes in women’s sports

The ruling determines that laws in West Virginia and Idaho do not violate the United States Constitution by limiting participation on women’s teams only to individuals whose sex assigned at birth is female.

The justices concluded that states have the authority to establish sports categories separated by biological sex within the education system.

The court’s majority also found that these restrictions are compatible with Title IX, the historic federal law that prohibits sex-based discrimination in educational programs receiving public funding.

The decision represents a major victory for states that have promoted similar regulations in recent years amid the intense national debate over transgender participation in sports.

Arguments that led the Supreme Court to this decision

The majority opinion was written by conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who defended the existence of separate sports categories for men and women.

According to the justice, physical differences between the sexes justify maintaining separate competitions in school and college athletics.

“The physical differences between men and women, such as strength, speed, and endurance,” justify the existence of teams separated by biological sex.

Kavanaugh also argued that “every biological male who makes the team takes a spot that would otherwise go to an athlete.”

The ruling establishes that even when a transgender person identifies as a woman and receives hormone treatments, states may restrict their participation on women’s teams.

Lawsuit was filed by two transgender athletes

The legal dispute that reached the Supreme Court began after lawsuits were filed by Becky Pepper-Jackson and Lindsay Hecox.

Pepper-Jackson is a high school student in West Virginia who challenged the constitutionality of the state law preventing her from competing in women’s sports.

Meanwhile, Lindsay Hecox, a University of Idaho student, also argued that the state legislation represented discrimination against her.

Both athletes argued that their exclusion from women’s competitions violated their constitutional rights and requested that the laws be declared invalid.

However, the majority of the Supreme Court rejected those arguments and allowed both laws to remain in effect.

The ruling could influence dozens of states

Supreme Court transgender athlete ruling: Restrictions upholded – PHOTO: Shutterstock

The decision affects not only West Virginia and Idaho but also strengthens the legal position of similar laws already approved in other states.

Currently, around 25 states have regulations restricting transgender athletes from participating on women’s school or college sports teams.

Although the ruling specifically addresses these two cases, its interpretation could serve as a reference for future legal disputes across the country.

Experts believe the decision will likely be used as a precedent in lawsuits involving sports policies promoted by different states.

The ruling comes amid new policies promoted by Trump

The case also unfolds within the context of measures adopted by the administration of President Donald Trump regarding transgender people.

After returning to the White House in January 2025, Trump signed an executive order establishing that the federal government recognizes only two sexes: male and female.

The policy also directs official documents to reflect sex assigned at birth.

That policy has been challenged by LGBTQ rights organizations, which argue that it violates fundamental rights of transgender people.

With this decision, the Supreme Court adds a new chapter to the national debate over gender identity, school sports, and the extent of state authority to regulate participation in women’s competitions.

You May Also Be Interested In: Supreme Court to End Term With Crucial Trump-Related Decisions

SOURCE: EFE