Supreme Court to End Term With Crucial Trump-Related Decisions

Key Supreme Court pending rulings

Trump awaits decisions

Cases could set precedents

The United States Supreme Court is preparing to end its current term with seven pending decisions that could redefine the scope of presidential power, election rules, and the debate over transgender rights.

Why it matters: Three of the remaining cases are linked to actions promoted by President Donald Trump and will test how far executive authority can extend.

Also at stake are rulings involving mail-in voting, campaign financing, transgender athletes’ participation, and the use of cellphone data in criminal investigations.

The nation’s highest court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, set June 29 as the next date to issue rulings, when it could resolve some or all of the remaining cases.

Supreme Court faces decisions that could redefine presidential power

As Supreme Court’s term nears its end, three major Trump rulings due https://t.co/SZACXQhxkh

— Reuters Legal (@ReutersLegal) June 28, 2026

The Supreme Court has seven open cases as it approaches the end of a judicial term that began in October and traditionally concludes at the end of June.

Three of those matters are directly related to decisions made by Donald Trump during the past year.

One examines the legality of his executive order seeking to limit birthright citizenship.

The other two review the president’s attempts to remove members of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the Federal Trade Commission.

You may also like: U.S. Bombs Iran Despite Peace Agreement

These disputes seek to determine how far a president can go when removing officials from agencies considered independent.

The Court has recently sided with Donald Trump in two immigration-related cases and in several emergency requests that allowed policies blocked by lower courts to take effect.

However, in February, it also dealt Trump a setback by rejecting broad tariffs issued under a law intended for national emergencies.

Cases involving officials and elections draw attention

As Supreme Court’s term nears its end, three major Trump rulings are due https://t.co/9EUfegkAwU #News

— The Right News, Right Now. (@BradPorcellato) June 28, 2026

During January arguments, several justices expressed doubts about Trump’s effort to remove Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve.

Cook remains in her position while the lawsuit is resolved and argues that the accusations used to justify her removal were a pretext.

Congress established that Federal Reserve governors may only be removed “for cause,” although the law does not define that standard.

In another case, the Supreme Court is reviewing the removal of Rebecca Slaughter, a Democratic member of the Federal Trade Commission.

Lower courts concluded that Trump exceeded his authority by ordering that removal.

The court must also rule on a Mississippi law that allows mail-in ballots to be counted up to five days after Election Day, as long as they were postmarked on or before election day.

During arguments, several conservative justices appeared skeptical of the law, while the administration supported the challenge brought by Republicans.

Another pending lawsuit questions federal limits on coordinated spending between political parties and candidates.

The case, involving Vice President JD Vance, raises arguments over whether those restrictions violate First Amendment protections related to free speech.

Transgender rights and privacy cases also await rulings

Another pending matter examines laws in Idaho and West Virginia that prevent transgender athletes from competing on women’s sports teams at public schools and universities.

During January arguments, conservative justices appeared inclined to support those restrictions.

The states argue the measures are intended to preserve fair competition for women and girls.

Critics say the laws are part of a broader effort to restrict transgender rights in the United States.

The Court is also reviewing a case from Virginia involving the use of “geofence” warrants in criminal investigations.

The dispute centers on whether collecting cellphone location data from people near a crime scene violates Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches.

The Supreme Court decisions 2026 issues in the coming days could influence presidential authority, election regulations, civil rights, and digital privacy for years to come.