Biden Sues DOJ to Block Release of Controversial Classified Audio Recordings

Biden Sues DOJ

Audio Recordings Spark Political Controversy

They Seek to Stop Public Release

Joe Biden returned to the center of political and legal controversy in the United States after filing a lawsuit against the Department of Justice, or DOJ, seeking to prevent the release of recordings and transcripts related to private interviews conducted for the writing of his memoir.

The former Democratic president is trying to keep that material from ending up in the hands of conservative groups and Republican lawmakers, arguing that its release would affect his privacy and could revive accusations over the mishandling of classified documents.

The lawsuit was filed in District Court in Washington, D.C., as the Department of Justice prepares to hand over part of that content to the Heritage Foundation and the House Judiciary Committee on June 15.

Biden Audio Recordings Were Key in Federal Investigation

Biden Sues DOJ to Block Release of Controversial Classified Audio Recordings – Photo: Shutterstock

The interviews in question were conducted between 2016 and 2017 by Mark Zwonitzer, the ghostwriter who worked with Biden on the book Promise Me, Dad: A Year of Hope, Hardship, and Purpose, published in 2017.

Years later, however, those same recordings became key pieces in the investigation led by Special Counsel Robert Hur, who examined Biden’s handling of classified materials after his term as vice president of the United States had ended.

The controversy increased after the special counsel’s report said Biden allegedly retained sensitive materials and shared fragments of classified information during private conversations related to the writing of his memoir.

Although Biden has denied deliberately disclosing classified information, the contents of the recordings could put him back under political and media pressure.

Joe Biden’s Legal Team Accuses DOJ of Sudden Shift

One of the main arguments presented by the former president’s lawyers is that the Department of Justice changed its position on protecting the material without offering clear explanations.

According to the lawsuit, the DOJ had kept both the audio recordings and the unedited transcripts obtained during the federal investigation, which concluded in February 2024, under seal. However, starting in February of this year, authorities allegedly began the process of allowing their partial release.

Biden’s defense argues that there is a significant risk of improper exposure of private conversations held at the former president’s home.

“President Biden, like any American, has a right to privacy in the personal conversations he has in his home. This is especially true here, where the Department obtained this information through a criminal investigation,” part of the lawsuit states.

Heritage Foundation and Republicans Seek Full Access to the Material

The possibility that the content could end up in the hands of the Heritage Foundation and Republican lawmakers has increased tension surrounding the case.

Both groups have pushed to obtain full access to the audio recordings and transcripts from Biden’s interviews.

For the former president’s circle, release of the material could be used politically to try to hold him responsible again for allegedly retaining classified documents after leaving the vice presidency.

The investigation led by Robert Hur concluded without criminal charges against Biden, although the final report generated strong political repercussions due to references to his memory and ability to recall certain events.

Court Order Could Block Release of Interviews

As the Department of Justice moves forward with the possible delivery of the documents and recordings, Biden’s legal team is seeking a court order to prevent any public release or transfer of the content to third parties.

The Biden DOJ lawsuit opens a new chapter surrounding classified documents and could escalate politically during the U.S. election season, especially because of conservative interest in using the case as an argument against the former Democratic president.

You May Be Interested In: New York Approves Controversial Tax on Luxury Homes Owned by Nonresidents

SOURCE: Axios/ La Opinión