New Trump order shakes election rules in the United States

Trump orders electoral control in the United States

Mail-in voting under review

Controversy over federal intervention

President Donald Trump signed an executive order to strengthen federal control over mail-in voting.

The measure directly targets a system he has consistently criticized.

Even this year, Trump himself used this method to cast his vote.

Why it matters: The decision reopens the debate over electoral control in the United States and could face legal challenges.

Trump order on mail-in voting creates impact

President Trump signs an executive order aimed at cracking down on mail-in voting. https://t.co/3rWR9re62Z pic.twitter.com/R0lZlHJYdf

— ABC News (@ABC) March 31, 2026

The federal government will provide states with a “comprehensive view” of eligible voters.

The goal is to centralize key information about who can participate in elections.

For its part, the United States Postal Service will have a more active role in the process.

According to Will Scharf, White House staff secretary, it will verify the sending of ballots.

It will also review that returned ballots correspond to eligible voters.

The measure seeks to ensure that only authorized individuals participate in mail-in voting.

You may also like: Congress pushes to resume suspended citizenship processes

Trump defended the order during its signing in the Oval Office on March 31.

He stated that the initiative “will help a lot in elections.”

He also said he considers the system “foolproof.”

Tensions in the United States over electoral control

Trump announces he is issuing an unconstitutional executive order to shut down mail-in voting nationwide and he will defund states if they do not comply with him pic.twitter.com/SCdxOXJ3bo

— Headquarters (@HQNewsNow) March 31, 2026

For months, Trump has suggested that the federal government could nationalize the electoral process.

That idea has generated rejection from both Democrats and some Republicans.

Critics warn about risks to electoral impartiality.

The Constitution establishes that states control “the times, places, and manner” of elections.

However, Congress has the authority to modify electoral rules.

Currently, election administration rests with state and local authorities.

The executive order could alter that traditional balance.

Experts anticipate that the measure will face challenges in court.

The debate centers on the limits of executive power over elections.

Political context and next steps

Trump has intensified his focus on election legislation ahead of the midterm elections, according to USA Today.

He has pushed the SAVE America Act as a priority in Congress.

This proposal would require proof of citizenship to vote.

The initiative faces strong opposition from Democrats and voting rights advocates.

Critics argue that it would make voting more difficult for eligible voters.

So far, the legislation remains stalled.

The executive order adds to this context of political dispute.

The debate over mail-in voting remains one of the most sensitive issues in the electoral process.

What’s next: A legal and political battle is expected over the implementation of the order.